Category Archives: MRA stuff

An accurate description of Generation Y women

http://www.the-niceguy.com/contributors/GoodMen.html

This was posted on The Nice Guy.com. I know It says satire and meant to be funny but it’s actually quite accurate has to how women my age, and those mostly in the anglosphere behave.

Where Did All The Good Men Go?

Satire by AldenHamil

I am a woman of Generation Y and I’ve just turned 29 years old. I’ve been looking for Mr. Right since I was 26 and there’s one little problem I keep running into: There are no Mr. Rights lining up to marry me! I know I’m not alone here, because I’ve seen plenty of articles on the Internet about women just like me having the same problem. I really don’t know what’s wrong with me, and why men aren’t more interested in me.

I’ll admit… I’ve made some mistakes. Like most women of my generation, I grew up being taught that I could do anything I wanted, and that there’d never be consequences for my actions. I was always taught that I deserved the world, and that my entire life would fall into perfect harmony any time I wanted it to, including marriage, promptly by the age of 30. You see, being taught these notions as a little girl, I decided to do what most of my girlfriends did: once I got out of high school, I spent the next ten years “finding myself” by spending all of my free time chain-smoking cigarettes and getting drunk in bars and clubs. There were many men I got involved with during this period of my life. None of them were the wholeseome kind of men you could build a life with, but I didn’t care. I wanted action. I wanted excitement and drama. I knew those men never cared about me and only wanted sex, but I gave it to them anyway. Some of them hit me, and a few smashed in my car windows, but whatever. I’ve been with over fifty men, not counting the ones I just fooled around with. Is this hurting my chance to find true love?

There were a few really great men who came into and out of my life during this period, usually from outside the bar scene. They were men who really cared about me, who were concerned for my well being, and who did the little special things to let me know they cared, but I ignored them. I did, I’ll admit it. Every man who came into my life who displayed these positive traits – the kind of traits that could have led to stability and happiness – I rejected. I found them boring. Honestly, I was having too much fun with my lifestyle to ever take notice of the men who actually treated me like a human being. I was addicted to promiscuous sex with bad boys who never loved me. Most of my girlfriends were the same way. Why settle for a good man before you have to, right?!

Now I’m 29 years old. I only drink on the weekends and I’ve curbed my smoking somewhat, but it’s taken a real toll on my body. My looks are fading, and my biological clock is ticking. I am a single mother of one child born out of wedlock to an abusive, no-good father who never loved me or even had a relationship with me. Not that I wanted a relationship – he was just some guy I met in a bar and I liked how he talked to me like I was dirt. What can I say, it made me hot. He’s currently in prison for armed robbery, so he’s not coming back for another eleven years.

I guess it helps to know that I’m not alone in this. Nearly all of my girlfriends made the same decisions I made, and we’re all having trouble landing quality, marriage-minded men now that we’re getting older. Where did all of those good men go? Didn’t they realize that all we needed was a decade of promiscuous, no-strings-attached sex with non-committed, low quality men, after which we’d be ready to “settle” for a decent, stable man and a house with a white picket fence?

I mean what gives? I’m done chasing bad boys and now I feel like I deserve to have a kind and hard-working man come and marry me and be a good provider and father to my son. I don’t care what he looks like as long as he’s over 6 feet tall, makes good money, doesn’t have kids, hasn’t ever been married, has a nice car, has his own house, is planning for the future, is confident, funny, independent (but not too independent), fashionable, suave, educated, cultured, and wants to treat me like the amazing, special person that I am. Is that really too much to ask? Why can I not find a man like this? Where did all the good men go?

Signed,

The Women of Generation Y

As you can see, its quite self centered and egotistical with standards that are way to high for most men to meet and completely unreasonable to any man who hasn’t been married. Which describes how women my age are perfectly.

The closeted racism,jealousy and Xenophobia of feminists. Along with their enablers.

By now, many people know about the Boycott American women blog http://boycottamericanwomen.blogspot.com/ something that most MRA’s are all ready doing. I’ve noticed how many feminists and mangina’s become instant racists because it violates their gyno-Americo centric views .
Terms like China dolls and yellow fever were invented by American sluts because of female jealousy against superior women, and is enabled by both Conservative and Liberal manginas.

I wrote this blog over a year ago and it still rings true.https://ooloncolluphid42.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/the-racism-and-xenophobia-of-western-women/ American women turn into racists and xenophobes when men prefer Asian & Eastern European women. Strong women don’t exist in America, why are they so jealous of non feminist women? Why do they need a man to validate their egos in the first place? Americans think they have the best education system in the world, which if you watch MSNBC or frequent blogs like daily kos or Huffington Post is utter bullshit. So women in developed countries are better educated then Western bimbos.

Jealousy is indeed what it is all about. Jealousy of women who are more attractive and better personalities then they do, jealous that she is the one not getting their attention, jealousy towards superior women is pretty much the norm. What other reason then jealousy that Amanda Knox conspired with two men and had killed Meredith Kercher killed?

Manginas enable and condone this behavior, mostly because if they didn’t they wouldn’t get laid. The earliest example of white knight is the Southern hangings of black men in early half of the twentieth century. Who is the most likely to be falsely accused of rape more often the white men? Well of course its black and Latino men, it’s also the same with minority men who are arrested because of VAWA.
So with all this evidence, how can one not conclude that feminism at its very core is nothing short of condoning racism and xenophobia.

America is screwed

First off, good riddance to the Blue Dogs, who took a dump on the middle class at the behest of the Republicans. Now that the right wing has control of the House, Democrats should start moving further to the left obstruct the American Taliban’s radical agenda.(not likly now, they haven’t grown spines sense the 2010 election) However since our President is a Neo Liberal which means a Democrat in name only, Barrack Obama will be the black version of Jimmy Carter if he decides to continue his failed strategy of trying to get cooperation from the right wing.

As a Men’s rights Activist, it would be rather stupid to think that the Republicans won’t screw us over as well. While the bimbos they tried to elect the Senate failed, men and women of both parties in the Village still suffer from feminist political indoctrination. There really is no difference between a “good christian woman” and a liberal feminist, expect methodology.
In addition to taking a shit on Unions, gutting the middle class , destroying social security, medicare, & endless warfare. I foresee a Bachelor tax on the horizon, backed by feminists and the GOP.

You might think this is impossible but take a look as what happened in Sweden when Conservatives and Feminists banded together in Islamophiba to ban minarets. Because we only have two parties there are White Knight manginas on both sides of the isle. In fact I even entered a term for the Republican version on Urban dictionary.link This is because the American whore after having sex with dozens of men while cheating on and dumping their boyfriends or husbands, will be told by feminists that men who refuse to commit or marry is a new form of “oppression”. Feminists will start collaborating with Conservative Christians there’s a difference? to push this new tax, “to preserve the sanctity of marriage” so privileged white women will be able to pilfer bank accounts of more men. However I wont forgot not to exclude the political indoctrination that feminism is trying to push on minorities as they seemed to have been successful with black women in particular.

Men who are not pussy whipped and fed up with the selfish American sluts would do well to leave the country. As America will become an increasing more hostel to young men under thirty even without the Slut agenda. Men have all ready been surpassed by women in higher education according to recent polls, with both parties turning a blind eye to it.
Only a few months into 112th congress Minimum Wage will be at risk, funding for Pell Grants will not be renewed, the House will be on it’s way on trying to repel health care reform as pathetic as it is, & planning to go to war with Iran. Who’s going to fight them? Not women with Conservative and Liberal manginas in charge and feminists dragging their heels on allowing women to be deployed to the front lines, as there preoccupied with perpetuating the sexual grievance industry instead of helping with any real progressive causes.

The only logical option for men under thirty will be learning another language, and moving to another country for their benefit and better education. As the environment will be become toxic towards straight men whose families are not at least upper middle class, forcing over educated whores to settle for a rich asshole, street trash or become a lesbian if she wishes for a potential mate, which to me is poetic justice.

If Democrats don’t move further to the left, Jimmy Carter 2.0 in 2012 will end up with both houses full of Republicans and well on his way to being impeached for what ever reason they can find. Think they won’t, they impeached Bill Clinton for a blow job and he was a white guy!. Of course, this assumes that Obama isn’t primared from the left if he fails to do what the base asks of him. Compromising with Republicans will only harm the country even more.

Men’s right activist who think this a good thing for men are other stupid old farts, conservative manginas or idiots all together,because I said before feminism has indoctrinated members of both parties. Those of us who know better will be telling other men what we’ve been saying all along. Move out of the country, because a “good christian woman” is nothing but a myth pushed by born again whores and Conservative manginas.

As for me, I don’t have the patience anymore and will be twenty eight years old when the next elections take place. My plan is learning another language as soon as possible from one of those socialist countries Republicans are so afraid of. Men would do well to avoid Lavtia because that is the percent feminist model for the rest of the world link. Looks like a great model for the feminist dream to me.

I think my personal plan has a high chance to work out for the better, women from these Asian/European socialist lands are hotter, less slutty, more intelligent and have a higher chance of having intact hymens in my age group than their slutty counter parts here. Because if I remain a dateless virgin who still lives with his parents at over thirty years old, my hate for all will increase tenfold and waiting for Democrats to get there act together isn’t looking like a viable solution.
Expect more men to leave America when it becomes obvious when we’re a third world country, because a third world country is what we’ll be if Democrats don’t move further to the left themselves. Good luck with that, because I find it better to cut my loses instead of helping a party that takes a crap on it’s own base instead of listening to the the people who elected them. For me to change my mind, Democrats will have to push everything through reconciliation in the Senete while bypassing the House or at least start obstructing Republicans every step of the way starting now.

Femenist apologism of female criminals

Usually, I take swipes at the right wing morons after I criticize the feminists, but enablers and excuse makers for crimes committed by women has forced me to focus on Feminism again.

First up Toy Soldiers covers the fail that is Jeff Fecke and his apologism and denialism of female sexual predators.
http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/feckes-one-third-fail/
"The bloggers at Alas, a blog have a notorious history of denialism and apologism when it comes to discussing male rape victims."

"The weather is as usual. What specifically gets to me about feminist
articles regarding male victimization is the hypothetical tone
employed. It is as if they are not talking about real experiences, real
events, real crimes, but rather some sort of thought experiment about
what male rape would look like if it happened. I think that is the true distinction. With female rape it is when it happens; with male rape it is if
it happens. I suppose that feminists like Fecke have that luxury as
they typically are not confronted with the reality of male
victimization, particularly at the hands of women. It is easy to take
that kind of tone when one never has to deal with the impact it has on
male victims."

This is pretty much what I mean when I say feminists have a double stranded towards crimes committed by women. In my last blog I did remember stating that "Of course, the most accurate definition of patriarchy is "Men who women
are attracted too" which happens to be the right wing snobs, homosexual
men, and thugina their attracted too. So patriarchy translates and can be
defined as "female sexuality", so when feminists recite their
favorite slogan do not be afraid to correct them. As for female sexuality
harming men I happen to agree, but that’s for another blog post. Before some
pseudo intellectual tries to twist my words. "Matriarchy" can also be
defined as "female sexuality" where women use their sexual power to
manipulate gullible boys and young men.
It can also cause damage to other women as well, as the feminist bible the
"Vagina Monologues" states that the rape of a young teenage girl is
"empowerment". Much like seducing young boys or drunken men into sex
is also "empowerment" and that he "wanted it".
.
A few paragraphs later I stated. "
When a man is raped, feminists engage in a double stranded. They question
weather a man was raped, by another man or a woman. Of course I suspect it’s
because the Americanized whore is turned on by a man being sexuality assaulted,
yoai fangirls weren’t the first to masturbate to male rape, but (feminists) did set the
precedent by ignoring it and telling the straight male rape victim to "man
up". Remember what I said about female sexuality harming men?
"

Of course once again, as Toy Soldiers points out. They still give female sexual predators excuses to rape by saying things like "She’s a victim too" ,"it’s worse when a man does it" and " not an issue generally worthy of concern".Indeed it is over ten times harder to admit to being a raped when the female apologists question a man’s sexuality for coming forward, or saying that "He should consider himself lucky" Words like that do nothing but making excuse for female criminals by allowing them to continue abusing boys and young men.
Even the justice system is skewered for the benefit women, as they general receive lighter sentences for violent crimes then men. I suspect criminal behavior being closer to forty-sixty because if the right wing media reported the truth about female crime statistics, they would loose funding and ratings.

 As Toy Soldier found a feminist who seems to be trying to keep things a little balanced.  Though a few days later Amanda Hess shows her true colors as one those ignorant D.C. villagers that we people in Maryland despise so much, as he latest blog gives the tired old latest "patriarchy" bullshit.


Factory himself calls them out for it as well, I look forward to his next rant against the moronic villagers.

"Hmm, more “reasoned Feminists”?

You know, if Feminists spent anywhere NEAR as much energy actually
listening to MRAs (as opposed to trying to thrust your own agenda upon
us) as you do trying to ridicule us (see: Ghandi)…well, you might just
have a foundation for your argument.

As it stands, this poor attempt at “understanding” definitely
illuminates both for it’s rarity, and the typical paucity of substance
involved.

For the record, Feminists have about as much right to dictate what
men want and need as MRAs do to dictate the needs of women. And there’s
no “Hierarchy of Rights” (officially)..if you as a woman have a right,
then I as a man should have the same right..

Keep that in mind."

Factory’s own Youtube rants allowed me to realize that "Patriarchy" is "Men that women are attracted too", equals "female sexuality". Thus nothing more then an ad hominem attack that is meant to trick men into giving up their agency and individuality.

http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/meeting-halfway/

"Likewise, feminists and men’s rights advocates have a lot in common, starting with both groups preposterously blaming all men and all feminists for all
the problems their respective groups face. However, like the religious,
feminists very rarely entertain the possibility that their views are
wrong, skewed or unproven. Neither side thinks highly of each other,
but men’s groups are actually willing to engage in debate and
conversation, to look at various statistics and studies and to examine
feminist positions. Feminists typically do not examine the men’s
groups’ position with any seriousness, often dismissing issues like
male rape, male victims of domestic violence, male suicide, father’s
rights and men’s health as “MRA bullshit.” That presents a difficult
situation in which one side thinks they are always right and knows
everything there is to know while the other side thinks they are right
and have to combat the severely delusional."


Next up is female murderers. Apparently feminists want to keep this little whore out of jail.  If her DNA evidence was found at the screen of the crime, it’s more then fair to put her in jail just like her two male co-conspirators. The American skanks won’t stop until as many men as possible for committing crimes. However in this case the men are just as guilty, They proberly did it for the promise of sex as the American whore typically desires to bring down as many males with her as possible.

http://www.the-niceguy.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=45657


"As expected, Hugo is already active – of course no word about that she
accused another unrelated innocent man for murder, to clear herself.


His conclusions are somewhat strange or baseless, at least for me." – yohan

"Wow . . . what a crock of shit. Most women like that get a slap on the wrist.


If
Knox isn’t directly involved with this as the doubters claim, she’s an
accomplice in the very least. Not to mention scapegoating someone else."
– Sociopathic Revelation.


Instead of posting links to the Captain Save ho’s blogs I only posted links and quotes from MRA websites. This is because the center right TV networks will only give you the feminist perceptive and claim that a female perpetrator is innocent and a "victim too" regardless of the evidence against them.

Feminists are siding with Conservatives to deny people of their rights

What the
mangina collaborationists, thugina and the women that who use these anti and
pseudo intellectual morons won’t tell is that these traitors are committing
acts of treachery against those who refuse to accept their fear mongering
beliefs.

One the things they sweep under the rug is that feminists are ignore the
collage gender gap.
Here is a post from Huffington post calling out the Michelle Obama for ignoring
the plight of men my age.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jessica-corry/mrs-obama-what-about-our_b_359452.html

The false rape society has re-posted statements that support this. I know it
came from another MRA website some were before then, but I cant it on Google.

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/11/battle-of-sexes-is-over-and-our-side.html

"When girls supposedly were behind boys in educational achievement, most
men agreed there was a problem with the schools; now that it’s clear boys are,
in fact, behind girls in every indicia of educational achievement, women insist
the problem is the boys and that the schools are just fine."

Of course it also points out the whores contradict themselves.

"When men outearned women, women were oppressed because the wage
differential could only mean discrimination; now that young women outearn young
men in urban settings, women are oppressed because they can’t find mates
who are their intellectual peers."

The western woman doesn’t deserve a man who is her intellectual equal, it
really is nothing short of poetic justice that they have settle for scumbags, one
night stands and rich ugly asshole Conservatives. The intelligent men of this
country are realizing that dating any here just isn’t worth it, and going with
women who haven’t been brainwashed by imperialist dogma.
Feminists are attracted to the right wing mangina because they have money,
while fantasizing over gay men because the whores want something they can’t
have. Even using dirty tricks to get the pussy whipped men to do their dirty
work in exchange for a blow job. Then expects the wannabe intellectual moron to
marry her after her pussy has been turned black by her rich ex-husband and too
far stretched out for the largest of penises after giving birth to more then
two children.

Thus the truly intelligent men are going for f origin women have not been
brainwashed. Of course, because their jealousy towards other women, feminists
rally for war to deny against other countries to deny man and women who are not
brainwashed of happiness.

In fact Switzerland
feminists have sided with the right wing to ban minarets to force their fascist
belief system upon the Muslim people. As an atheist, I know that banning
religious symbols is not the way to enlighten people about their deluded
beliefs. They sided with the right wing just because something resemble a
penis, what next banning all tubes because they look vaguely like a dick?
John Stewart put it best "Banning houses of worship is the first step of
ethnic cleansing" Now you know why I call feminism a racist ideology.

However they may bitch about male power and the patriarchy, but before I move I
need decode these words. Power as explained by more prominent Men’s rights
activist can be broken down into agency and identity. So in essence the goal is
to shame men into giving up their rights as an individual. To sum it, this
translates to "Shut up and know your place, boy" under the
matriarchy.
Of course, the most accurate definition of patriarchy is "Men who women
are attracted too" which happens to be the right wing snobs, homosexual
men, and thugina their attracted too. So patriarchy translates and can be
defined as "female sexuality", so when feminists recite their
favorite slogan do not be afraid to correct them. As for female sexuality
harming men I happen to agree, but that’s for another blog post. Before some
pseudo intellectual tries to twist my words. "Matriarchy" can also be
defined as "female sexuality" where women use their sexual power to
manipulate gullible boys and young men.
It can also cause damage to other women as well, as the feminist bible the
"Vagina Monologues" states that the rape of a young teenage girl is
"empowerment". Much like seducing young boys or drunken men into sex
is also "empowerment" and that he "wanted it".

Now, back to the subject. Feminists have sided with the right wing warmongers
to drum up support for the wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan.
http://ihatewhitewomen.blogspot.com/2009/12/feminists-caused-wars-in-iraq-and.html.
In an attempt to "liberate those poor oppressed unenlightened women"
When evidence points that women had more rights under Saddam, then under the
corrupt government they now have.

http://www.antiwar.com/ips/suri.php?articleid=8784

"Under Saddam, she said, "women could go out to work, university, and
get married or divorced in civil courts. But at the moment women have lost
almost all their rights and are being pushed back into the corner of their
house."
The recent constitution, which was written under the U.S. government’s supervision, is
"very backward and anti-women," Mahmoud said. "They make Islam
the source for lawmaking, and the main official religion of the country. This
in itself means Islamic Sharia law, and according to this, women will be
considered second-class citizens and will have no power in deciding over their
lives."

So in an odd irony, now it is the fault of the feminists that Muslim women will
be subject to Sharia law. Saddam himself was guilty of atrocities against both
men and women. They tend to ignore how many were man killed under his regime,
but they seem to only care about female victims of any crime, unless it happens
to be a gay man their sexually attracted too.
I remember a video that recorded a rant from an Iraqi woman with an engineering
degree backing up the fact that Iraq
is now worse under the feminist supported occupation. Feminists are going to
spend decades apologizing for that screw up, which is just more poetic justice.

Of course, when their failing at "liberating those poor women" in the
middle and far east. They wage war against their own brothers and sons in the
West, In Australia, misandry is at its worse.  http://australianmisandry.blogspot.com/2009/11/beware-boys-australian-female-taliban.html
Over there the media seems to be going out of its way to cover up any evidence
of female crime. Disgusting isn’t it?

They seem to have gone as so far to as to use a Nazi like indoctrination upon
boys and girls by forcing them into compulsory indoctrination programs. Of
course this is how the national socialist party grew to power in Germany during
the late 1930’s, by claiming to be victims of the Jews. Much like how feminists
claim how all women victims regardless if they commit acts of domestic
violence, murder or rape. Even if no man is involved in their actions and
personal choices.

The media was rather perplexed when a Sunday school teacher raped and killed an
eight year old girl. As they usually blame men when a woman comets a horrific
crime. However here there is no man to blame, Melissa Huckaby acted alone, but
to this day the feminists are searching for a man to blame so they can put him
in jail in place of a woman.

When a man is raped, feminists engage in a double stranded. They question
weather a man was raped, by another man or a woman. Of course I suspect it’s
because the Americanized whore is turned on by a man being sexuality assaulted,
yoai fangirls weren’t the first to masturbate to male rape, but did set the
precedent by ignoring it and telling the straight male rape victim to "man
up". Remember what I said about female sexuality harming men?

Here’s story from the false rape society that about their double standard.
http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/12/atrocious-double-standard-when-woman.html

"Worse are the comments under the story.  Victim blaming doesn’t
apply to males raped behind bars — they are getting what they deserve. 

There you have it.  A female alleging rape is a national crisis, and the
male(s) she accused are de facto
criminals, guilty until proven innocent.  On the other hand, a male
alleging rape might have been
raped — or he just as easily might be lying.  Rape has become so
terribly gender politicized that even questioning a female’s rape allegation
makes one a misogynist.  But a rape claim by a 17-year-old boy in
jail for shoplifting?  Few people care about him, aside from his
father and some of us.  His victimization is not equal to the
victimization of a female.

There is, of course, something terrible, something immoral about this
double standard, and we need to speak up about it. "

When the liberals began to refuse to fallow the feminists blindly, they will
began prostitute themselves and ally themselves with the conservatives to deny
the rights of men and women who refuse to be sheeple. This leads me to surmise
that the feminists are basically the Democrats equivalent of the tea baggers.
Using fear mongering and hateful slogans to control the political discourse.

The failure here is that they used sex in a half assed attempt to give people
the illusion that men and women were equal, now it is women who are in the
leadership potions and they still continue to be complain because they can’t
handle the responsibility. I am reminded of what Peter Parker’s uncle Ben told
him before he became Spiderman "With great power comes great
responsibility". However responsibility without out the agency and identity
(i.e., Power) to use it is meaningless. Thus I won’t blame any man who refuses
to associate with the Americanize feminist whore. Power and responsibility
should be shared, not redistributed. Though any feminists never talks about
giving women any share of responsibility.

The solution here would be instead of sexuality equality, intellectual
equality. However that would require women to work hard and become equals with
men mentally. Feminists underestimating both sexes decided to dumb men down by
using sex as their weapon of choice instead. In that respect they have
succeeded, as looks, game, and swagger are now more valued then intelligence.
To tell another man their stupid is being an asshole or a "queer",
while telling a woman she is stupid "sexist" and then questions their
sexuality. I really doubt intellectual plain will be even until more women start
thinking without their "feelings".  

Of course here in lies another contradiction.

"Women say they want men to be less "manly" and more sensitive
and caring; those same women refuse to date actual men who are more sensitive
and caring because they aren’t sufficiently "manly."

Touchy feely politically correct bullshit is the main reason "Nidal Malik
Hasan" was able to get far enough to shoot and kill his fellow soldiers. I
am no means blaming feminists for his actions, but a delusional belief in a sky
fairy is what causes a conflict of interest in regard a person’s loyalty to
their country. (yes I am saying that all people who believe in a god are
potential terrorists)

What feminists are doing is forcing political correctness down people’s
throats. This is turn alienates the intellectuals, thus turning their fellow
"liberals" against them. So in order to implement their goals of
shackling and suppress those who won’t fallow their doctrine, feminists in the
near future will have no choice but ally themselves with the conservatives.
Like the conservatives and feminists of Switzerland
or the fail that is centrist Labor party such as in Australia.

Yes I did blame feminists for yoai and the marginalization of male rape, just
like I can blame them for Twilight for making sissies called
"vampires" the bad boy flavor of the decade. http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c241/Velocity06/TwilightMoms2.jpg
(yeah that comes from an MRA website)
Of course, I would expect my claims to be dismissed as an ultra leftist
conspiracy theorist just because I’m not rich, a woman, gay, or anything one
else the feminist whore is attracted too. It would be typical of the
matriarchal underclass.
Remember it is feminists who stabbed their fellow liberals in the back first,
so it is more then fair to respond in kind.

Exposing feminist hypocrisy

http://community.post-gazette.com/blogs/radicalmiddle/archive/2009/08/31/men-are-from-wilkinsburg-women-are-from-collier.aspx

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/08/brilliant-article-destroys-claim-that.html

Lurking on both feminist websites and MRA sites has proven the fact that feminists are using  "George Sodini " as a manufactured villain to spread misandry.

As a Men’s rights advocates I view Sodini as a moron for obsessing about Westernized skanks and spending the money to buy guns instead of using it to travel aboard to meet real women not infested with the mental illness known as radical feminism.

Also I another one from the False rape society as well.

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/08/women-are-essentially-encouraged-to.html

False rape accusations harm all victims of rape for both genders. I all ready mistrust most young women in this country, but that’s because I might catch an airborne venereal disease.

Study Shows Single Women Prefer to Date Attached Men

http://www.synergy-pr.com/press/MelissaBurkley,PhD/51/800/0

A study shows evidence what most men who don’t have a feminized mindset knew all along. (thugs, players, pick up artists and "feminist men" are the types who do)

Chris Rock said it best : "When a man sees a pretty woman that’s taken, he says, ‘I want a woman like that!’ But when a woman sees a handsome man that’s taken, she says, ‘I want HIM!’"

Feminists ignore male victims of abuse

http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2009/06/08/feminists-deny-truth-on-domestic-violence-noh/
http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2009/08/03/the-only-one-noh/

It looks like modern feminists groups likes to sweep male rape and sexual abuse under the rug. I’ve heard more then once that said the teenage victim should feel lucky after having sex with an older woman, but that is part of their agenda. It doesn’t provide them with any political leverage to help boys or men who have been subjected to abuse.

Because of these views, it doesn’t cross the minds of the ignorant that women can be abusers and rapists as well. The matriarchy that is propagated by the second and third waves don’t want too admit this. Only one feminist website even bothered to cover this fact, and I was only able to find one article on the subject. However just one article on a website isn’t going to stop from me from being critical of modern feminism.